Seattle U.
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
749  Lauren Hammerle SR 21:16
863  Hannah Mittelstaedt SR 21:24
910  Sophie Curatilo JR 21:27
1,244  Lila Rice FR 21:49
1,424  Taylor de Laveaga SO 22:00
1,462  Elena Smith SO 22:02
1,562  Madison Davis SO 22:08
1,784  Jennifer Stolle SR 22:21
2,392  Moira O'Connor Lenth FR 23:01
2,660  Amy Clawson SR 23:19
2,674  Emily Hedberg SO 23:20
2,870  Rebecca Lassere SO 23:38
2,989  Meghan Arigo JR 23:50
3,042  Amy Tolentino JR 23:57
3,191  Lindsay Frederick SO 24:18
3,266  Haley Kruell JR 24:29
National Rank #169 of 340
West Region Rank #25 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 27.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren Hammerle Hannah Mittelstaedt Sophie Curatilo Lila Rice Taylor de Laveaga Elena Smith Madison Davis Jennifer Stolle Moira O'Connor Lenth Amy Clawson Emily Hedberg
Bill Dellinger Invitational 10/05 1216 21:15 21:29 21:47 22:06 22:05 22:22 21:48 22:15
Emerald City Open 10/19 1220 21:20 21:40 21:28 22:06 22:11 22:10 22:02 22:34 22:51 22:56 23:08
Beaver Classic 10/25 1302 22:08 21:50 22:21 23:05 23:30 23:24
WAC Championships 11/02 1174 20:59 21:17 21:20 21:39 21:55 22:03 22:02
West Region Championships 11/15 1192 21:35 21:15 21:17 21:29 21:40 21:47 23:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.0 658 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 2.5 5.7 17.7 20.4 16.2 12.4 8.9 6.5 4.0 2.2 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Hammerle 106.6
Hannah Mittelstaedt 117.9
Sophie Curatilo 122.3
Lila Rice 152.3
Taylor de Laveaga 167.5
Elena Smith 170.1
Madison Davis 177.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 2.5% 2.5 18
19 5.7% 5.7 19
20 17.7% 17.7 20
21 20.4% 20.4 21
22 16.2% 16.2 22
23 12.4% 12.4 23
24 8.9% 8.9 24
25 6.5% 6.5 25
26 4.0% 4.0 26
27 2.2% 2.2 27
28 1.3% 1.3 28
29 0.7% 0.7 29
30 0.4% 0.4 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0